Upon arriving to the lab, members done written advised concur. Players was in fact sitting at the a pc and expected to-do an excellent questionnaire, which included an assessment of personality and you may issues determining intimate spouse being compatible. As in the earlier training, grandiose narcissism try assessed towards Narcissistic Identity Inventory (NPI ? = .86, M = , SD = eight.20) and you can Huge Five personality traits into Big Five List (BFI) . To have neuroticism, ? = .82; M = dos.77, SD = 0.80; having extraversion, ? = .84, Meters = step three.46, SD = 0.72; getting openness to try out, ? = .75, Meters = step three.55, SD = 0.58; to own conscientiousness, ? = .76; Yards = step 3.67, SD = 0.56; as well as agreeableness, ? = .73, Yards = 3.97, SD = 0.51.
It questionnaire was not used for analysis whilst was part of the protection facts. People had been advised the suggestions they given would-be utilized to suit them with individuals towards campus who has similar passion. Ultimately, intercourse, age, and you will relationships condition was in fact reviewed.
Following the procedure outlined from the Parker and you can Burkley , people was second shown a picture of a goal personal and you will told you to centered on their prior responses, he’s got “equivalent welfare” using this target. The ladies seen an image of the male target together with males viewed an image of a female target. These types of pictures was indeed pre-checked out from the a ple for their level of elegance using an excellent 10-area scale, such that step 1 = most unappealing and you can ten = most attractive. Brand new indicate get into the men photos try 6.62 (SD = step 1.86) in addition to suggest rating to possess girls photographs are 7.03 (SD = 1.29). Such as Parker and you may Burkley, i including asked players some questions regarding the fresh participant’s interest in the target, however, the depending details had been precisely the items that analyzed mate poaching particularly. Responses were made to your 5-point scales such that 1 = most unlikely and you will 5 = totally possible. The things was in fact a great) “How probably could you be to follow this individual getting an excellent matchmaking?” (Yards = 2.43, SD = 1.28), and you may b) “Exactly how more than likely can you getting and come up with aside with this specific personal?” (M = 2.38, SD = 1.34). We and analyzed the latest extent that brand new fellow member discover the brand new address glamorous having fun with a 5-point measure in a fashion that step one = extremely unsightly and you will 5 = most glamorous (Yards = step 3.76, SD = step 1.15).
Results
We very first created every variables ahead of calculating analyses. I up coming determined correlations between predictor/control details (the major Five details) and you will lead variables, which happen to be shown from inside the Desk 6. Grandiose narcissism was coordinated having a heightened odds of making out on the target, yet not which have finding the target glamorous or following the target to have a romance.
Professionals was in fact at random allotted to a description of address as the “single” or “for the a love” and you may was after that expected when deciding to take an initial questionnaire toward amount of interest he has got from the target
We then registered variables towards a good regression model; primary variables out-of participants’ relationships standing, target matchmaking condition, sex, and you can NPI scores was basically inserted towards the 1 (managing to have Huge Five parameters), most of the a couple-method relations certainly one of number 1 variables were joined towards the 2, the three-way adam4adam coupons affairs one of number 1 variables was registered to the 3, additionally the five-method communications among no. 1 details try registered on Step 4. Just like the not one of your own four-ways relationships reached mathematical advantages, Step 3 analyses is said in Dining table eight.
For finding the goal attractive, simply main effects for intercourse and you will an effective participants’ relationship position was indeed tall. Males was indeed prone to find the address glamorous than just females, and you will single men and women were likely to get the address attractive than affixed somebody. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t an effective predictor to find the target attractive in general (? = -.067, t = -0.913, p = .362) and you may grandiose narcissists did not get a hold of attached targets much more glamorous than unattached objectives (? = -.052, t = -0.842, p = .401).